For a larger image, see: http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/images/590metabolism.gif
It is (apparently) important for a constant and steady provision of glucose to various parts of the body (including the brain, which does not itself store glycogen); I suppose that this is somewhat like gas to an automobile engine: you have to keep the pedal steady to maintain a particular speed. For more details on this process, see "Introductory Metabolism Module" (Histology and Physiology 101; University of South Australia) and/or "Carbohydrate Metabolism" (General, Organic and Biochemistry, James K. Hardy, University of Akron).
We all need sugars to survive. The trouble for those with type 2 diabetes is the regulation of that sugar.
Personal Opinion Based on Experience--Anecdotal
This topic is a touchy one for me, a topic closely tied to years of confusion, frustration, and ultimately, anger. I read somewhere that my generation of women, the generation of yo-yo dieters, has suffered tremendously from poor dieting advice and the pressures of advertising and news media to conform to a particular size in an particular way. Since I was 12, when my doctor found that I was "two pounds over the normal weight" for my size and age, I have been placed on or placed myself on diets. Two pounds. More recently, I had a doctor suggest that I go on the South Beach Diet (the latest fad) or else consider stapling my stomach (another recent trend in medicine). There will be other blog entries on how fatness is a social (feminist, masculinist, experimentalist, whatever) issue; however, my point here is that many members of the medical profession (not all, but many) have misled both themselves and their patients. The general impression that I have gotten from doctors over the years is that I should simply reduce either the amount of sugar (from chocolates to breads, dairy products, fruits, and starchy vegetables) and/or the amount of calories. But I firmly believe that this is the central reason that I have become increasingly heavier and heavier. My latest nutritionist and diabetes doctor (both of whom are excellent), when she found out how few calories I was ingesting each day (about 1300-1500, the latter on days of exercise), she exclaimed, "You're starving yourself!" I knew it was true: my stomach kept me up at night with grumblings, and I was having a hard time thinking in my work--but I had been told to ignore these symptoms!
So, back to the topic: we all need sugars (and calories) to survive. This is not the debate, I believe. I believe the debate is quality of sugars, as well as a balance of types of sugars. For example, according to Janet Jankowiak, MD, if you have diabetes (the inability to regulate sugars at a constant level), you "are more likely to have a heart attack or stroke at a younger age" and you may also "be at a greater risk for a decline in mental function--brain decay--or dementia" ("Too Much Sugar May Cause 'Brain Decay', Neurology, 2004). According to Dr. Nicholas Bello, reporting on a Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine animal research project:
So, the questions seem to be:Dr. Bello and colleagues report that either continuous eating or binge eating a high fat, high sugar diet alters opioid receptor levels in an area of the brain that controls food intake. Opioids are a family of chemicals with actions similar to those of morphine; however, opioids exist naturally in the brain and have been linked to feelings of pleasure and euphoria. “These results are interesting because we saw changes in opioid receptor gene expression in a brain area that controls how much we eat during a meal”, said Bello. (ScienceDaily, Aug. 6, 2009)
- How much is too much?
- How much is enough?
- What kind(s) of sugars should be digested (and how much)?
No comments:
Post a Comment