Sometimes bad-tasting tea is just bad tea. |
Mopping Up Bad Tea |
Flying around Facebook has been the following little ditty:
This is great... Read this if you appreciate or even hate teachers.
Are you sick of high paid teachers? Teachers’ hefty salaries are driving up taxes, and they only work 9 or 10 months a year! It’s time we put things in perspective and pay them for what they do - baby sit! We can get that for less than minimum wage.
That’s right. Let’s give them $3.00 an hour and only the hours they worked; not any of that silly planning time, or any time they spend before or after school. That would be $19.50 a day (7:45 to 3:00 PM with 45 min. off for lunch and plan — that equals 6 1/2 hours).
Each parent should pay $19.50 a day for these teachers to baby-sit their children.
Now how many do they teach in day…maybe 30? So that’s $19.50 x 30 = $585.00 a day. However, remember they only work 180 days a year!!! I am not going to pay them for any vacations.
LET’S SEE…. That’s $585 X 180= $105,300 peryear. (Hold on! My calculator needs new batteries).
What about those special education teachers and the ones with Master’s degrees? Well, we could pay them minimum wage ($7.75), and just to be fair, round it off to $8.00 an hour. That would be $8 X 6 1/2 hours X 30 children
X 180 days = $280,800 per year.
Wait a minute — there’s something wrong here! There sure is!
The average teacher’s salary (nation wide) is $50,000. $50,000/180 days = $277.77/per day/30 students=$9.25/6.5 hours = $1.42 per hour per student–a very inexpensive baby-sitter and they even EDUCATE your kids!)
--Anonymous (I've seen different authors listed with different Facebook posts.)
Most folks have seen what's been going on in Wisconsin in the national news. I do not agree that Wisconsin's crisis is comparable to that of Egypt's. However, it is clear that the agenda of Wisconsin's governor is suspiciously good-ol'-boy-ish, as we all know who and what is funding his current agenda. Furthermore, according to one article, "In a Sunday morning interview from Madison with Fox News, Walker said he did not believe union leaders were really interested in giving up their benefits and cities, school districts and counties will need weakened unions to cut spending for years to come. Walker said he would not compromise and predicted Wisconsin would pave the way for other states to follow suit, much like it did with welfare reform and school vouchers in the 1990s" ("Hundreds Protest Wisconsin Plan to Cut Worker Rights"). I also do not quite see a direct correlation between the Hitler's 1933 act to abolish unions in Germany and the Ohio and Wisconsin governors' movements to abolish unions today (see, for example, newjunkiepost's "May 1933: Hitler Abolishes Unions").
However, it is clear that public servants--with the exception of Republican (including tea-partying) politicos--are not appreciated (see, for example, "Governor Kasich on Labor Issues"). Nor is this lack of appreciation for the worker--public or private--unique to Ohio and Wisconsin. According to NPR, "At a news conference at the Capitol a couple of days later, Boehner was asked whether the spending reductions Republicans were seeking might end up putting even more people out of work. He acknowledged this was indeed possible" ("Threat of Shutdown Looms Large Over Budget Debate").
As one opinion article in Wisconsin stated, "I don't believe that I am overstating the facts when I say our political leaders are declaring war on working families" ("Letters: Mention of Wisconsin National Guard Doesn't Bode Well for Workers"). Northeastern Ohioans know the meaning of entanglements with the National Guard all too well.
Mary Ann Vecchio (14 years old), kneeling over the body of Jeffrey Miller, who was just shot dead by the Ohio National Guard. (Photo by John Filo) For more information, see: "The May 4 Shootings at Kent State University: The Search for Historical Accuracy" (by Jerry M. Lewis and Thomas R. Hensley) |
Ask one of your Poli Sci colleagues to check on taxpayer funded medical insurance coverage for elected state officers, whether Republican or other.
ReplyDelete1.What is covered?
2.What do the insured pay for the coverage?
3.Does it end when they leave office?
4.If not, how long does it last?
Electeds, too, are workers, after a fashion, but not unionized. They don't have to be.
Bob P